Congresswoman Elise Stefanik: "Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard's code of Conduct? Yes or no?"
Harvard President Claudine Gay: "It depends on the context."
I watched the testimony in Congress of the presidents of Harvard, University of Pennsylvania and MIT with bewilderment. I could not imagine any context in which calling for the genocide of any religious or ethnic group would NOT constitute bullying or harassment. If you were a Jewish Harvard student walking through Harvard Yard on your way to class, how could you not feel bullied and harassed if a group of your fellow students were marching around with signs saying "Exterminate the Jews!" What the F is going on here? Am I missing something? The situation is doubly strange because Harvard has always had a large contingent of Jewish students and faculty. How could it be otherwise given the generally high academic standards of American Jews compared to other groups? I might have expected the University Community to be a little reluctant to criticize Israel's hard-core Zionists, but equivocating about calls for the genocide of Jews seems outrageous.
In what context is calling for genocide acceptable behavior? Ms. Stafanik didn't ask the University presidents to ban the study of genocide in history or to not ask questions about what drives people to commit acts of mass murder. How is "calling for" the genocide of Jews different from calling for any other heinous crime? Would it be OK to call for burning down Widener Library or attacking campus police with baseball bats?
I have to confess I was a little put off by the issue of Harvard Magazine that rather gushingly profiled the new president Ms. Gay. Given the woke mind- fucking of academia that preceded and accompanied the COVID debacle, it was hard not to suspect that Ms. Gay had been appointed because she was a black woman rather than because of her abilities. Maybe the masters of the universe who rule this richest university in the history of the cosmos were intent on displaying their equity and diversity while they grind the majority of mankind down to a reduced population of technocratic serfs. Of course, assuming this to be the case would be terribly unfair to Ms. Gay. Another academic "woman of color," (pardon that grotesque phrase) one Dr. Carol Swain, has accused President Gay of plagiarizing her work by using it without citations in her doctoral thesis. I have no idea what the truth of that matter is. OOPS, I just heard Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownstone Institute referring to Ms. Gay's other instances of plagiarism. Does she believe in collectivizing scholarship so that she is free to partake of others' research without proper attribution? OOps again. It turns out President Gay is now correcting a couple of other papers where paragraphs or sentences were lifted with only minor word changes. Hmmmm, I just read president Gay's response in a public statement: "I stand by the integrity of my scholarship." This sounds a lot like government speak, the generic non specific denial of "wrongdoing" without addressing any specific accusation. Harvard's governing board agrees, claiming her "inadequate citation did not constitute research misconduct" because it was not done "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly." Maybe she fell into a trance and was simply channeling Carol Swain's work, you know like some of those New Agers who channel the words of the ascended masters for their clients. It's kinda like automatic writing. The words just pour out of you. You don't really know where they came from.
I went to Harvard myself in the era of anti-Vietnam War protests, so I get Harvard Magazine for life, just like every other alumnus. I still don't know much about Ms. Gay, but her response to the Congresswoman seemed bizarre. It was even more bizarre that neither of the other two college presidents could answer with a simple "Yes, it violates our code of conduct to call for the genocide of Jews." What part of "Yes" do you not understand, ladies? The three seemed united in their determination to not answer a simple question with the simple answer required of any civilized society. It doesn't matter how you feel about Israel's claims to Palestinian land or Hamas' claim to be resisting a tyrannical occupation. Unless we are proposing the abandonment of all the ethical norms that the modern world at least pays lip service to, in NO context can a Harvard student or faculty member "call for genocide" without bullying or harassing those members of the group whose genocide they are calling for. The three college presidents seemed to be suggesting that there were situations, i.e. "contexts" in which calling for the genocide of Jews might not violate college codes against bullying and harassment. What the hell is going on?
I had the terrible feeling as I watched the questioning by Congresswoman Stefanik that the three college presidents were showing the telltale signs of brainwashing. Not one of them could bring herself to categorically condemn calls for genocide and each implied logically, by their inability to do so, that there were conceivable circumstances when calling for genocide would NOT violate the colleges' codes of conduct. Moreover, not one of them seemed to grasp that this was the unavoidable implication of their testimony. Back in the old days, every Harvard freshman HAD to take a course in expository writing that was mainly a kind of Logic 101. It was a course that laid down the no BS allowed standards that would be expected during your undergraduate studies.
At the link below Ilana Rachel Daniel interviews doctor and neuroscientist Michael Nehls who claims he has discovered how falsified science, lockdowns and incessant propaganda combined with COVID injections can actually shrink the hippocampus in the brain. It turns out that the self-replicating inflammatory spike proteins inhibit the production of index neurons that are the correlates of curiosity, empathy and critical thinking. These index neurons harbor our personal narratives, the emotionally charged memories around which our personal identity forms. The more virulent batches of the experimental injections could, according to Dr. Nehls, render people easier to manipulate and control by literally altering brain chemistry. This may explain some of the strange, disaffected behavior that has become more common in the wake of the mass injection of the public. Nehls is an MD PhD researcher who has made significant discoveries about Alzheimer's disease,
The "new improved" SARS-COV-2 spike protein which our government developed with taxpayer money is much better at penetrating the blood brain barrier than previous injectables. No one ever did a study to see when these nasty little proteins would stop replicating and get flushed out of the body. They just followed the new scientific protocol adopted unanimously by Federal Health authorities: If it's a money maker, pull "the science" out of your ass without doing any long term studies and ram it down the throats of the public via your accomplices at NPR and the other branches of the Ministry of Truth. Here's the interview with Dr. Nehls.
Harvard sure seems to have been having a deleterious effect on society recently. Remember good old Charlie Lieber, Chemistry Department head, one of the innovators of the injected nanotechnology. He got busted by the FBI for collaborating with the Chinese, did six months in jail, then disappeared from public view. Harvard went full in on vax mandates. Harvard thus violated the principles of the Nuremberg Code and engaged in coercing its community members to take an experimental medical treatment. It's overseers were complicit in spreading misinformation about ivermectin and other ways of treating the syndrome of symptoms called COVID. Are we supposed to believe that none of the prominent leaders in the scientific community in Cambridge could remember that ivermectin, which government propaganda derided as "horse paste," had won the Nobel Prize in medicine after safely treating billions of people who were infected with parasites that cause river blindness? These guys follow the Nobel Prize awards the way bookies follow football scores and batting averages. I wonder how much money the university makes from Lieber's patents. I'm just glad Jeffrey Epstein was suicided before he could give so much money to the University that they had to name a building after him, you know something like The Jeffrey Epstein Center for Child Welfare and International Relations.
Speaking of Harvard, who should pop up in some video on YouTube but my classmate Al Gore. I had a nodding acquaintance with him back in the day, would occasionally find myself at a dinner table with him, and we were in one class together. I knew that he was a Tennessee senator's son but would only have remembered him vaguely if he hadn't made waves with his book Earth in the Balance and then ended up as Vice President. He and his ex-wife and I and my ex-wife performed together at Sanders Theater at our 25th Reunion. He and his wife Tipper did a funny skit which made fun of Al's inability to dance. Susannah, my ex and I, followed them, performing a couple of songs from our newly released album. Oh, what innocent times those were.
Here we are all these years later and there's Gore in his role as Climate Change alarmist on YouTube. Early in the interview he mentioned his "good friend Klaus Schwab," and a chill ran down my spine. Could Al Gore really be hobnobbing with the vile old Nazi whose World Economic Forum is one of the most evil organizations on earth? Yes. And NO, these self appointed saviors of the planet are not just stupid rich people though that does seem to be a prerequisite for membership in the club. Schwab is the "genius" who wants to establish a new centralized global government to end all governments, an authoritarian bureaucracy which will presumably keep the hoi polloi confined in fifteen minute cities. Schwab and his mother-WEFers (to use Cliff High's term) are always pulling ideas out of the garbage can of history and trying to make the public swallow them. Doesn't this sound a little like Hitler's "Thousand Year Reich?" As my Irish ex mother in law used to say, " It's not from the ground he takes it." Old Klaus after all these years is still trying to restore the ideology of his prominent Nazi family. But this time, dear reader, it's not the Jews and the gypsies he's coming for, it's you...assuming you're a human.
One of the WEF's "thought leaders," Israeli historian, Yuval Noah Harare, who home schooled himself in molecular biology and genetics without the benefit of a laboratory or peer reviewed research has now mapped out the future of evolution on earth. Luckily for him it involves the creation of humanity 2.0 which will be diverted into a remnant population of humans who by virtue of the nanotechnology injected into their heads will "own nothing and be happy" to serve their masters, i.e., the rulers of the New World Order including Harari himself. Oh, look! Here's his book, Homo Deus. For those of you who don't know Latin, that means Man God. It's not about being gay. Though Harari is gay, heterosexuals will be allowed into the ruling class if they have enough money. Otherwise Al Gore would be out of luck.
You see this whole remaking of society is necessary because the increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere will fry us. We'll be crispier than this jumping toad that was mummified instantaneously in mid leap by one of those directed energy weapons that were used to remove the natives and old hippies from Maui:
Thank God they put up that black plastic fencing all around Lahaina so we couldn't see the people who met the same fate as that toad. I'm having enough trouble sleeping as it is. Anyhow, as we all know, Al Gore is uniquely qualified to save the planet because first of all he went to Harvard which we know from its endowment to be the pinnacle of higher education whether or not its president knows what plagiarism is. PLUS Gore went on to do extensive climate studies at Goldman Sachs whose leadership has long recognized how global warming could be used to implement the kind of zoning regulations that will keep areas of the planet safe and green for bankers, drug lords and arms dealers. It's only fair since the drug lords and arms dealers are doing so much to reduce the population, and let's face it, even Al Gore's got to admit that without global swarming there would be no global warming....... EXCEPT IF IT WERE CAUSED BY SOMETHING OTHER THAN CO2 which is currently .04% of the planet's atmosphere.
OK, I've got to sign off for a while, go wrap presents and put some new strings on my guitars. I'm sorry about what's happened to Harvard, not to mention the United States. When I was in college we didn't think about diversity. It's who we were. My freshmen floor mates included a couple of Jewish doctor's sons, a gay black opera singer from Harlem, some blue collar guys from Midwest factory families, a Mormon missionary from Utah, two college professors' sons and a guy from one of America's richest founding families whose wealth had been obliterated during the Great Depression after two hundred and fifty years. The last guy was me. My father drilled wells for a living. When the geology didn't cooperate, it sometimes took a long time to get paid and we barely held on to the last few acres of my grandfather's land. It took me many years to fully appreciate the nobility of my father's work, pulling up clean drinkable water from the unseen realms deep under the ground, often running the whole drilling rig by himself in all kinds of weather, working at a trade he taught himself because he really didn't have the formal education most people of his social background did. He was proud that I was able to get a scholarship to Harvard, something I could never have done if I had not had two hard working parents who made sure their home fostered a love of learning and gave me advantages they never had except as a kind of ancestral memory. They would be as horrified as I am to see Harvard ranked number 1 in censorship and attempting to whitewash academic misconduct at the highest level for which I would have probably been expelled. I don't usually reveal much about my personal life on Substack. Hey, it's the holidays. Maybe Harvard AND the United States can be redeemed somewhat in 2024. And by the way, climate change IS a danger to humanity just as it has been ever since Homo Heidelbergensis migrated out of Africa back in the Pleistocene era. That is why we don't need the likes of Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab figuring out how to control the narrative in ways that put profit and control ahead of objective science.
Now I've got to go help Santa prepare his list of who's been naughty or nice. It may take a couple of West Virginia mines working overtime for Santa to be adequately supplied with lumps of coal to fill all the stockings hanging up at the White House and in the posh suburbs of Washington.
Comments
No posts